That’s just what the world needs; another acronym. Except this one happens to be a particularly useful one, especially at this moment in time. Let’s start by unpicking the jargon. What exactly is the difference between KPIs and OKRs, and why does it matter?
KPIs v OKRs
KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) measure output, whereas OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) assess and evaluate outcomes. A KPI might be to make 100 calls a week. Whereas your OKR would be to convert five of those calls into sales, from however many calls you make. So the questions they provoke are; what do you want to achieve (Objective), and how are you going to do it (Result)? The OKR model has been around for a while now. It was first popularized by John Doerr, who developed it from work begun by Andy Grove during their time working together at Intel. That work had itself evolved from Peter Drucker’s seminal ideas around Management by objectives (MBO). And, as Doerr outlines in his book Measure What Matters, its most famous early adopters were the team at Google, who’ve been using the OKR model since all the way back in 1999. In that book, Doerr sums up OKRs as follows:“(They) include a meaningful, concrete, clearly defined goal and three to five key results that support that goal. (So it’s) a collaborative goal-setting model used by organizations to achieve challenging, ambitious goals.”With the emphasis being on ambitious. Because OKRs are meant to stretch you. If each of your objectives has gone green at the end of the (usually) six-month period, you need to start recalibrating your goals. Those goals operate at an individual level, at group and unit levels, and even at a departmental level. Though obviously, the wider the reach, the closer it gets to conventional strategy.